| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stevebez
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 Posts: 63 Location: San Dimas, CA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:29 am Post subject: Q & 4.2/3.3, possible? |
|
|
| Has anybody sucessfully run either 4.2 or 3.3 using Q? I keep getting disk errors. Which drivers should I use? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
helf

Joined: 29 Dec 2005 Posts: 1093 Location: Alabama, USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm assuming Q = Qemu? _________________ *INACTIVE* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kb7sqi

Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 481 Location: Winston Salem, NC
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 7:54 am Post subject: Re: Q & 4.2/3.3, possible? |
|
|
| stevebez wrote: | | Has anybody sucessfully run either 4.2 or 3.3 using Q? I keep getting disk errors. Which drivers should I use? |
Look thru the threads here in the subforum. You'll see you need to apply some patches to the qemu source to get everything working properly. I use OPENSTEP 4.2 daily under OpenSolaris. I've also compiled Q for OSX and tested it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevebez
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 Posts: 63 Location: San Dimas, CA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:58 pm Post subject: Re: Q & 4.2/3.3, possible? |
|
|
| kb7sqi wrote: | | Look thru the threads here in the subforum. You'll see you need to apply some patches to the qemu source to get everything working properly. I use OPENSTEP 4.2 daily under OpenSolaris. I've also compiled Q for OSX and tested it. |
Any chance of getting a pre-patched copy from you? I'm compiler stupid.
Also, qemu would be much faster than VPC5, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
neozeed
Joined: 15 Apr 2006 Posts: 444 Location: New York City!
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:47 am Post subject: Re: Q & 4.2/3.3, possible? |
|
|
| stevebez wrote: | | kb7sqi wrote: | | Look thru the threads here in the subforum. You'll see you need to apply some patches to the qemu source to get everything working properly. I use OPENSTEP 4.2 daily under OpenSolaris. I've also compiled Q for OSX and tested it. |
Any chance of getting a pre-patched copy from you? I'm compiler stupid.
Also, qemu would be much faster than VPC5, right? |
Yes, qemu even without the cpu driver is FASTER than vpc5...
I've had too many people try to hack vaxenrule.com so I don't have a good place to place binaries, but if you know of a place to host stuff, I can upload patchsets & fully built versions.... We aren't talking that much space...
Directory of C:\NeXTSTEP
06/02/2008 12:14 AM 130 ns.cmd
05/17/2008 07:56 PM 35,328 vgabios-cirrus.bin
05/17/2008 07:56 PM 37,888 vgabios.bin
05/17/2008 07:56 PM 131,072 bios.bin
06/07/2008 02:41 PM 966,691 qemu-img.exe
05/17/2008 02:37 AM 1,723,602 SDL.dll
05/30/2008 10:32 AM 5,617,555 qemu-rhapsody.exe
05/25/2008 01:25 PM 5,621,789 qemu-90.exe
06/07/2008 05:07 PM 5,772,933 qemu-snap.exe
08/03/2008 07:42 PM 1,498,329,088 ns33.disk
version 0.9.0 runs fine under Vista64, as do the later snapshots, but the mouse code is going to be 'involved' so I've just been hoping the next version will release soon... _________________ # include <wittycomment.h> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kb7sqi

Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 481 Location: Winston Salem, NC
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:57 am Post subject: Re: Q & 4.2/3.3, possible? |
|
|
| stevebez wrote: | | kb7sqi wrote: | | Look thru the threads here in the subforum. You'll see you need to apply some patches to the qemu source to get everything working properly. I use OPENSTEP 4.2 daily under OpenSolaris. I've also compiled Q for OSX and tested it. |
Any chance of getting a pre-patched copy from you? I'm compiler stupid.
Also, qemu would be much faster than VPC5, right? |
Which would you like x86 or ppc?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevebez
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 Posts: 63 Location: San Dimas, CA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:43 pm Post subject: Re: Q & 4.2/3.3, possible? |
|
|
| kb7sqi wrote: | | stevebez wrote: | | kb7sqi wrote: | | Look thru the threads here in the subforum. You'll see you need to apply some patches to the qemu source to get everything working properly. I use OPENSTEP 4.2 daily under OpenSolaris. I've also compiled Q for OSX and tested it. |
Any chance of getting a pre-patched copy from you? I'm compiler stupid.
Also, qemu would be much faster than VPC5, right? |
Which would you like x86 or ppc?  |
PPC please! I don't think my tiBook would like the x86 version much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kb7sqi

Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 481 Location: Winston Salem, NC
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:30 pm Post subject: Re: Q & 4.2/3.3, possible? |
|
|
| stevebez wrote: | | kb7sqi wrote: | | stevebez wrote: | | kb7sqi wrote: | | Look thru the threads here in the subforum. You'll see you need to apply some patches to the qemu source to get everything working properly. I use OPENSTEP 4.2 daily under OpenSolaris. I've also compiled Q for OSX and tested it. |
Any chance of getting a pre-patched copy from you? I'm compiler stupid.
Also, qemu would be much faster than VPC5, right? |
Which would you like x86 or ppc?  |
PPC please! I don't think my tiBook would like the x86 version much. |
Ok, I'll post the PPC version on my site in the misc section later after work. I'll update the post when I do get it uploaded. Take care. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevebez
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 Posts: 63 Location: San Dimas, CA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How about the ultimate agony:
Load vpc5 on a beige G3 running 10.2
Run qemu x86 under vpc5
Run os 4.2 under that
Sounds like good times! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kb7sqi

Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 481 Location: Winston Salem, NC
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stevebez wrote: | How about the ultimate agony:
Load vpc5 on a beige G3 running 10.2
Run qemu x86 under vpc5
Run os 4.2 under that
Sounds like good times! |
That sounds like truly painful experience. Ok, sorry for the delay, but my weekend got messed up w/ work. You'll find a gzip'ed Q dmg file in the misc section on my site. It's about 6.6 megs compressed. It's for PPC only and has neozeed's QEMU patches applied. I've tested it w/ NEXTSTEP 3.3 & it supports the color video & the mouse works. If you're planning on running it on a beige G3, I'll warn you, it's going to be SLOW. I compiled it on one my spare iMac's running Tiger 10.4.11. Should run on panther also though. Let me know how it works for ya. Take care. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevebez
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 Posts: 63 Location: San Dimas, CA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank you very much for your help so far, but it "no worky". The program launches fine, but when I go to start the virtual machine I get "qemu unexpectedly quit, library not loaded". Any ideas? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kb7sqi

Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 481 Location: Winston Salem, NC
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stevebez wrote: | | Thank you very much for your help so far, but it "no worky". The program launches fine, but when I go to start the virtual machine I get "qemu unexpectedly quit, library not loaded". Any ideas? |
Can you run it from the command line & see what it's trying to load? What version of Mac OSX are you running also? It's built on Tiger, but should run on Panther also. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevebez
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 Posts: 63 Location: San Dimas, CA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kb7sqi wrote: | | stevebez wrote: | | Thank you very much for your help so far, but it "no worky". The program launches fine, but when I go to start the virtual machine I get "qemu unexpectedly quit, library not loaded". Any ideas? |
Can you run it from the command line & see what it's trying to load? What version of Mac OSX are you running also? It's built on Tiger, but should run on Panther also. |
The only way to run it from the command line that I know of is to use the open command. Doing so gives me no extra information.
I'm running 10.4.11 on an 800 mhz tiBook. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kb7sqi

Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 481 Location: Winston Salem, NC
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stevebez wrote: | | kb7sqi wrote: | | stevebez wrote: | | Thank you very much for your help so far, but it "no worky". The program launches fine, but when I go to start the virtual machine I get "qemu unexpectedly quit, library not loaded". Any ideas? |
Can you run it from the command line & see what it's trying to load? What version of Mac OSX are you running also? It's built on Tiger, but should run on Panther also. |
The only way to run it from the command line that I know of is to use the open command. Doing so gives me no extra information.
I'm running 10.4.11 on an 800 mhz tiBook. |
I'll re-compile it again. Just to make sure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
openstepjunky
Joined: 14 Jul 2008 Posts: 24 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If QEmu uses SDL, maybe he doesn't have SDL installed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|